graph TD
A[Start: Learn Sequence] --> B[Discussion 1<br/>Classification & 1st MLP]
B --> C[Discussion 2<br/>Refinement & 2nd MLP]
C --> D[Discussion 3<br/>Mastery & Stages]
D --> E[Final Goal:<br/>Video Mastery]
Project: Cup Tapping Sequence
Applying Motor Learning Principles Through Practice
Welcome to the Cup Tapping Project!
In this multi-part assignment, you will learn a complex manual skill: the Cup Tapping Sequence. Beyond just learning the moves, you will apply Motor Learning Principles (MLPs) and analyze your own progress using the Fitts & Posner Stages of Learning.
Practice the cup tapping sequence until you can perform it smoothly, fast, and accurately (under 7 seconds), while documenting your learning journey through three specific discussion phases.
Assignment Roadmap
Thinking about how this assignment flows? Here is the bird’s-eye view:
The Skill: Cup Tapping
The activity consists of a series of hand claps and cup taps performed in a specific rhythmic order.
Video Demonstration
Step-by-Step Guide
| Step | Visual | Action Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() |
Ready: Hands flat on lap. |
| 2 | ![]() |
Clap: Clap hands twice. |
| 3 | ![]() |
Tap: Right-Left-Right (or L-R-L) on the cup. |
| 4 | ![]() |
Clap: Clap hands once. |
| 5 | ![]() |
Move: Pick up cup with right hand, move it to the right. |
| 6 | ![]() |
Clap: Clap hands once. |
| 7 | ![]() |
Tap Cup: Pick up cup with left hand; tap top with right palm. |
| 8 | ![]() |
Touch Down: Tap table with cup bottom; then lift. |
| 9 | ![]() |
Switch: Pass cup to right hand; left hand flat on table; cup down. |
| 10 | ![]() |
Finish: Clap twice – ready to repeat! |
Discussion #1: Skill Classification & MLP Application
In this first phase, you will get familiar with the movement and identify what kind of skill this is.
- Initial Post: Due end of Week 3
- Peer Responses: Due end of Week 4
The Workflow
graph LR
A[Practice 10 mins] --> B[Read MLP Blog]
B --> C[Practice with 1 MLP]
C --> D[Write Initial Post]
D --> E[Respond to 3 Peers]
Requirements
1. Practice & Preparation
- Step A: Practice the sequence for 10 minutes to “get it in your hands.”
- Step B: Read the Motor Learning Principles blog post.
- Step C: Pick ONE principle and practice for another session applying it.
2. Initial Post (70 points / 250 words min)
Use these headings in your post:
- Skill Classification: Classify by musculature (fine/gross), specificity (discrete/serial/continuous), and environment (open/closed). Justify each!
- MLP Applied: Which principle did you pick? How did you use it? What happened?
- Challenges & Strategies: What was hard? How will you fix it next time?
3. Peer Responses (30 points)
- Respond to three classmates.
- Suggest specific solutions for their “Challenges.”
- Min 150 words per response.
| Category | Excellent (pts) | Satisfactory (pts) | Needs Improvement (pts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skill Classification | (18-20) Accurate & justified. | (13-17) Basic justification. | (0-12) Inaccurate or missing criteria. |
| MLP Application | (18-20) Insightful examples. | (13-17) General examples. | (0-12) Vague or incorrect. |
| Challenges/Strategies | (12-15) Specific & practical. | (8-11) General. | (0-7) Vague or impractical. |
| Format | (12-15) 250+ words, clear headings. | (8-11) Near 250 words, some headings. | (0-7) Under word count, poor structure. |
Discussion #2: Continued Practice
Now, we add variety. You’ll compare how different strategies affect your learning.
- Initial Post: Due end of Week 8
- Peer Responses: Due end of Week 9
The Workflow
graph LR
A[Practice 15+ mins] --> B[Apply DIFFERENT MLP]
B --> C[Compare with D1]
C --> D[Write Initial Post]
D --> E[Respond to 3 Peers]
Requirements
1. Practice Session
- Practice for at least 15 minutes.
- Apply a different Motor Learning Principle than the one you used in Discussion #1.
2. Initial Post (70 points / 200 words min)
Use these headings: 1. New MLP Applied: Paraphrase the principle and explain your implementation. 2. Analysis: How does this new MLP compare to the first one? Which felt more effective? 3. Progress Tracking: What has improved since Discussion #1? What is still “clunky”?
3. Peer Responses (30 points)
- Respond to three classmates.
- Compare your experiences with different MLPs.
- Min 100 words per response.
| Category | Excellent (pts) | Satisfactory (pts) | Needs Improvement (pts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLP Comparison | (25-28) Deep analysis of both. | (18-24) Basic comparison. | (0-17) Vague or minimal comparison. |
| Progress Analysis | (21-24) Detailed & specific. | (15-20) General changes. | (0-14) Vague or minimal. |
| Strategy Evolution | (16-18) Clear problem-solving. | (11-15) Some development. | (0-10) Little evidence of change. |
Discussion #3: Mastery & Analysis
The grand finale! You will demonstrate your skill and reflect on your entire journey.
- Video & Initial Post: Due end of Week 12
- Peer Responses: Due end of Week 13
The Workflow
graph TD
A[Final Practice for Speed] --> B[Record Video Mastery]
B --> C[Analyze using Fitts & Posner]
C --> D[Write Initial Post]
D --> E[Respond to 3 Peers' Analyses]
Part 1: Video Submission (20 points)
Record your best performance.
- Goal: Under 7 seconds (Mastery level).
- Rules: Single, continuous shot (no edits!). Clear lighting and full view of hands/cup.
- How to Submit: Upload your video to YouTube (you may set it as “Unlisted”) and submit the link to the dedicated Canvas assignment link.
Part 2: Initial Post (50 points / 250 words min)
Use these headings:
- Fitts & Posner Analysis: Which stages (Cognitive, Associative, Autonomous) did you go through? At what point? Use specific evidence from your practice logs.
- Learning Reflection: Compare your “Day 1” self to now. What was the “Aha!” moment?
- Future Application: How will you use these MLPs to learn other movements in the future (sport, rehab, daily life)?
Part 3: Peer Responses (30 points)
- Respond to three classmates based on their written analysis.
- Discuss their reflections, compare your learning stages, and provide thoughtful feedback.
- Min 150 words per response.
| Criteria | Excellent (5) | Satisfactory (3-4) | Needs Imp. (0-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | ≤ 7 seconds | 7.1–10 seconds | > 10 seconds |
| Control | Smooth & stable | Minor wobbles | Frequent drops |
| Technique | Fluid motion | Minor errors | Poor placement |
| Accuracy | Perfect | 1-2 small mistakes | Major errors |
| Category | Excellent (pts) | Satisfactory (pts) | Needs Improvement (pts) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stages Analysis | (18-20) Compelling evidence. | (13-17) Basic alignment. | (0-12) Inaccurate stages. |
| Progression Reflection | (15-17) Comprehensive comparison. | (11-14) General comparison. | (0-10) Vague or minimal. |
| Integration | (11-13) Expert MLP integration. | (8-10) Basic connections. | (0-7) Minimal integration. |









